Skip to main content

Ender's Game


Summary: 
Ender is a Third in a world where families are only allowed to have two children. His sadistic older brother and a school bully make his young life miserable. Then his monitor is removed and he is taken up to Battle School. Ender is pushed by his teachers and Bonzo, the battle school bully, to his absolute max. Ender is successful in the battle room and is quickly promoted to Command School. Realizing that his accelerated promotion means that the commanders believe he may be the next great military mind, Ender feels the pressure as he realizes that winning the Bugger War and the fate of Earth both lie in his hands.

Strengths: 
Orson Scott Card creates a immersive future world with disturbing clarity. The government programs set up to identify gifted children and the world of Battle School are well described. The slightly more controlled, Lord of the Flies type world is believable. The story is told in third person with almost all of the narrative focused on Ender, though there are some sections told by the adult commanders as well as a few inner chapters that focus on the political scheming of his two older siblings as they work to affect Earth's political landscape in preparation of the end of the Bugger War. The violence in the book is unflinching and brutal. The brutality of war both in a physical and mental sense is a strong theme in the book.

 Card, O., & Harris, J. (1991). Ender's game (Rev. ed.). New York: Tor. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Bloom's Taxonomy for a Digital Age

Bloom's Taxonomy. One of the things we are constantly hearing in our school is the push for increased rigor in our classroom, as a result of the STAAR tests and others like it becoming more rigorous. We are told to push for higher order thinking and questioning from our students. One of the tools we use to look at how we can increase rigor is Bloom's Taxonomy. But some things about Bloom's don't translate exactly when we are talking about the digital age and the classroom or library. For example, remembering is the lowest piece of the triangle for Bloom's, but remembering looks different when you have instant access to a powerful computer that can use essentially limitless online resources to find answers. I've mentioned to my husband just how much more this and future generations will know about the world around them simply because they no longer have to remember everything they're interested in knowing. If I pass a historical marker for a place I haven...

Library Communication and Social Media

When social media became a "thing", businesses were one of the first entities to jump on board. Many companies realized that social media created an essentially free way to advertise. As social media developed, targeted marketing using social media became an even more effective way to communicate and advertise with specific consumer bases. Educational entities eventually got on board as well. What does this have to do with your library? Plenty. Let's take a look at most popular social media platforms - Facebook and Twitter, and how they are being used by libraries to promote and communicate with their clients as well as help educate and connect library staff members worldwide. Stay tuned for a future post on the social media platform that is ahead of Twitter in teen use, Instagram. Facebook The brain child of Mark Zuckerberg and his Harvard classmates, Facebook was created in 2004 as a way for college students to connect online. Myspace, a Facebook predecessor, had al...

The Clark-Kozma Debate in the 21st Century

In the 1980s and 1990s, as educational technology was first becoming a budding field, Richard Clark published an analysis of data where he determined that the media that delivers instruction is no more than a delivery tool. He used an analogy of a truck carrying the information to the learner. He concluded that the media chosen has no effect on the learning taking place - that the instruction in the only thing that influences the learning.  In 1994, Kozma responded and prompted the current debate. Kozma states that some media have specific characteristics that do effect learning as more than a vehicle. While there is little research to support Kozma's claim, he suggests that the way the media helps shape the learning does have impact and that evaluating this impact requires more than raw data as the media and the way we use it has become more complex and nuanced. Clark has stood by his original conclusions and has even subsequently released articles further supporting his stanc...